390 lượt xem
19/11/2024The graph below shows the number of immigrants to three countries from 1990 to 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the annual number of immigrants to the USA, Canada, and Australia from 1990 to 2001.
Overall, the USA consistently attracted the highest number of immigrants despite a steady decline. On the other hand, Canada saw stable figures while Australia experienced growth towards the end.
In 1991, the USA received just under 1.5 million immigrants, peaking at approximately 1.8 million in 1992. However, numbers plummeted to about 1 million by 1993, after which immigrants to the US gradually declined to their lowest point of roughly 700,000 between 1999 and 2000. A slight rebound occurred in the final year, with the figure rising to around 900,000 by 2001.
Meanwhile, Canada’s immigration levels started at 200,000 in 1991 and then slightly increased to about 250,000 by 1994 before returning to just over 200,000, where it remained over the next 5 years. Immigration to Canada then spiked to its peak of just over 400,000 in 2001. In contrast, Australia had the lowest numbers, hovering at about 100,000 throughout the period with the exception of a slight dip to about 50,000 between 1994 and 1995. It ultimately managed to peak at just under 200,000 immigrants over the last two years.
immigrant (n.): người nhập cư
immigration level (n.): mức độ nhập cư
a steady decline (n.): sự giảm sút
a slight rebound (n.): sự phục hồi nhẹ
a slight dip (n.:) sự giảm nhẹ nhưng đột ngột
peak at (v.): đạt mức cao nhất là…
plummet to (v.): lao thẳng xuống
gradually decline to (v.): giảm dần đến…
slightly increase to (v.): tăng nhẹ tới…
spike to (v.): tăng đột ngột đến…
hover at (v.): ổn định ở…
Accuracy: This report effectively fulfills the task requirements. It provides an overview and identifies key trends, such as the USA’s consistent decline, Canada’s stability, and Australia’s late rise.
Coverage: It includes key details like peaks, trends, and fluctuations for each country. The report would be fully satisfying the criteria for covering all significant features with clear comparisons.
Structure: The report follows a logical sequence, beginning with an overview and detailing each country separately. This layout makes it easy to follow the analysis.
Cohesive Devices: There is a good use of transitional language, with cohesive devices allowing the report to flow smoothly.
Range: The report effectively uses a variety of vocabulary to describe trends (e.g., “plummeted,” “spiked,” “hovering”).
Precision: With accurate information, the language used to describe data points would match correctly with the trends observed, further enhancing clarity.
Complex Sentences: The sample shows a good control of complex sentence structures and diverse grammatical forms, including comparisons, relative clauses, and passive constructions.
Accuracy: There are few to no grammatical errors, with most sentences grammatically sound and well-constructed.
The report is well within the band 8.0 range. It effectively covers all key features, uses precise vocabulary, and demonstrates clear grammatical accuracy.
Qua bài mẫu Writing Task 1 trên KTDC mong các bạn không chỉ nắm được cách trả lời cho dạng bài Line graph, mà còn học được những từ vựng và cấu trúc hay để miêu tả các biểu đồ tương tự nhé.
Ngoài ra, nếu các bạn đang tìm lớp học cải thiện 2 kỹ năng Speaking & Writing có thể xem thêm thông tin lớp học tại đây nhé. Đến với KTDC các bạn sẽ được học và chấm chữa chi tiết 1:1 bởi cựu giám khảo IELTS cùng với phương pháp KTDC Total Immersion giúp rút ngắn 40% lộ trình học, nhanh chóng đạt mục tiêu đề ra.
